페이지 선택
당당한 자기성취와 완성의 기회를 열어드리는 학교
여러분의 도전, 미국동양학대학교가 함께 하겠습니다.
법정대학

I. Introduction
“Overview of a Civil Suit”
II. Initiating a Lawsuit
1. Drafting a Complaint
Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, 2, 8(a), 10(a)-(b)
Form 11 (.pdf)
Field & Kaplan (F&K) 34-46 [do questions 2, 4-9; stop where “Statements of Claim in the Alternative” begins]
Twombly Complaint (just to pass your eyes over, do not read)
Study Questions
2. Pleading Fraud
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)
Study Questions
3. Rule 11
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d), 11
F&K 46-50 [do question 10-12]
Study Questions
4. Filing, Service
Fed. R. Civ. P. 3; 4(a)-(b); 4(c)(1); 4(c)(2); 4(e); 4(h); 4(l)-(m); 77(a)
Form 3 (.pdf)
Glannon Ch. 18 [EXCEPT pp. 351-55, that is, sections entitled “Relation of Service of Process to Personal Jurisdiction” and “Federal ‘Long-Arm Statute’ in Rule 4”) [do Examples 1-10, 11a, 12a, 13a, & 14a in Ch. 18 of Glannon.]
U.S. Const. Amend. V & U.S. Const. Amend. XIV § 1
F&K 678-81
Study Questions
III. The Pleading Period
1. Defenses: Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
a. Federal Question
U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2, cl. 1; 28 U.S.C. § 1331
F&K 231-36 [do questions 1-3 and 7] [do not read footnote a on p. 232]
F&K 247 [do question 18]
F&K 432-434 [do question 6]
Recommended: Glannon 63-73
Study Questions
b. Diversity
U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2, cl. 1; 28 U.S.C. § 1332
28 U.S.C. §1332(c)(1)
F&K 236-244 [do all questions]
Study Questions
Study Questions
F&K 475-479 [start at Rose v. Giamatti]
Study Questions
Glannon 89-94 & Questions 1-11
c. Removal
28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)-(b), (f)
28 U.S.C. § 1446(a)-(d)
F&K 244-246 [do all questions]
F&K 479-480 [do questions 26-27]
Glannon Ch. 7 [do all Examples]
Study Questions
d. Diversity: The Amount in Controversy.
F&K 469-471 [do question 18]
Glannon 96-99 [do Examples 12 and 13]
28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(2)
Study Questions
2. Defenses: Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
a. Personal Jurisdiction in State Court
i. The Pennoyer Framework
First Restatement on Pennoyer
Second Restatement on In Personam, In Rem and Quasi In Rem
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV § 1 and Art IV, § 1; 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Study Questions
ii. Elaborating the Pennoyer Framework
F&K 513-14 [stop right before section entitled “Federal Actions under 28 USC § 1655”]
F&K 517-18 [section entitled “Jurisdictional Amount” – do questions 6-8]
F&K 518-21 [start at “Presence as Basis for Jurisdiction”; end right before “Grace v. MacArthur”] [do question 9]
F&K 522-25 [Start at “Fraud and Force” don’t do Hess] [do questions 11, 13, 14, 17-19]
F&K 530-33 [ “Appearance as Defendant”; don’t do Hess] [do not do questions]
Study Questions
iii. The International Shoe Framework
F&K 535-546 (start at “Foreign Corporations: Background of the International Shoe Case”)
Study Questions
iv. General Jurisdiction
F&K 548-552 [do question 31]
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, No. 10–76 (June 27, 2011)
Study Questions
Daimler AG v. Bauman, No. 11-965 (January 14, 2014)
Study Questions on Daimler
v. Specific Jurisdiction
F&K 552-555 [stop at Modern Jurisdictional Statutes] [do question 32]
Study Questions
vi. Specific Jurisdiction: Products Moved by Consumers
F&K 598-609
Study Questions
vii. Specific Jurisdiction: Stream-of-Commerce
F&K 614-15
Study Questions
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987)
J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, No. 09-1343 (June 27, 2011)
Study Questions
viii. Specific Jurisdiction: Intentional Torts
Walden v. Fiore, No. 12-574 (February 25, 2014)
Study Questions
xi. Are Quasi-In-Rem Actions Still Viable?
F&K 582-595 [do question 41]
Study Questions
x. Is Tagging Still Viable?
F&K 615-18
F&K 521 [Grace v. MacArthur only]
Study Questions
xi. Review of Personal Jurisdiction
No other study questions
b. Personal Jurisdiction in Federal Court
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)
U.S. Const. Amend. V
Glannon 113-14; Glannon 352-55
Study Questions
3. Defenses: Lack of Venue
28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)-(d)
Recommended: Glannon Ch. 8 [all Examples]
Study Questions
4. Distinguishing Personal Jurisdiction, Venue and Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Glannon Ch. 9 [do all Examples]
Recommended: Glannon 109-113 [and all Examples for Ch. 6]
No study questions other than those in Glannon
5. Answers, Pre-Answer Motions, Defenses, Waiver of Defenses
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7; 8(b)-(d); 12(a)(1)-(2), (4); 12(b); 12(e)-(f); 55(a)
F&K 51-52 [section entitled “Types of defenses and objections”] [do questions 14 & 16]
F&K 61-62 [section entitled “Replying to Defenses”] [do questions 24-25]
Glannon Ch. 19 [do all questions]
Study Questions
6. Amending
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), 15(c), (d)
F&K 68-75 [do question 34, 39 and 40]
Glannon pp. 385-93 [do Examples 1-11]
Study Questions
7. Joinder and Complex Litigation
a. Compulsory Joinder of Actions/Claim Preclusion
F&K 702-12 [do all questions]
Study Questions
F&K 717-24 [do all questions, including questions (3)-(5)]
F&K 734-35 [sections entitled “On the Merits” and “Restatement (Second) of Judgments”; do question 19]
Recommended: Glannon Chs. 26-27
Study Questions
b. Counterclaims
Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(a)-(c)
F&K 62-68 [do questions 26, 31-33]
F&K 529-530 [Adam v. Saenger only] [do questions 25 and 26]
Study Questions
c. Joinder of Parties and Claims
Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(g)-(h); 14(a)-(b); 18(a); 20(a)
Glannon Chs. 13 & 14 [do all Examples]
Intersection of the Joinder Rules with Personal Jurisdiction and Venue
Study Questions
d. Necessary Parties
Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(a)-(b)
Glannon 283-90 [do questions 1-6]
Study Questions
e. Intervention
Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)-(b)
Glannon 290-95 [do questions 7-13]
Study Questions
f. Pendent/Ancillary/Supplemental Jurisdiction
U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2, cl. 1
Distinguishing Pendent and Ancillary Jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367
Glannon Ch. 16 [do all questions] [NOTE: The second paragraph in the answer to Question 8 in the new edition of Glannon (on p. 326) is wrong.]
Study Questions
g. Removal and 1441(c)
28 USC 1441(c)
Study Questions
8. Issue Preclusion
a. Introduction to Issue Preclusion
F&K 745-756 [do questions 2-4, 6-12, 16-17]
Recommended: Glannon Ch. 28
Study Questions
b. Exceptions to Issue Preclusion
F&K 759-760 [Moser case only]
F&K 768 (2d Rest.)
Study Questions
c. Privity
F&K 771-72 (don’t do section on 2d Restatement)
Study Questions
d. The Mutuality Requirement
F&K 778-780 [do question 4]
Study Questions
e. Nonmutual Issue Preclusion – Bernhard
F&K 781-786 [do questions 5-8, 10]
Study Questions
f. Nonmutual Issue Preclusion in the Federal Courts: Parklane Hosiery
F&K 789-793
Recommended: Glannon Ch. 29
Study Questions
IV. Discovery Period
1. Disclosure/Discovery
F&K 75-79 [stop at section entitled “Depositions upon oral examination”; do questions]
Glannon 435-63 [do Examples 1-17]
Study Questions
2. Limits on Discovery/Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b); 26(g)
F&K 94-95 [section entitled “Sanctions for failure to make disclosures or to cooperate in discovery”] [don’t do questions]
Glannon Ch. 21 [do all questions]
Study Questions
3. Terminating Litigation Early/Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c)-(d), 56
F&K 127-130 [do questions 81-83, 85]
Study Questions
V. Trials, Judgments, Enforcement of Judgments
1. Verdicts, Directed Verdicts and Judgments N.O.V.
F&K 202-09 [do question 38-41]
No study questions.
2. Judgments, Enforcement of Judgments
F&K 221-223 [do question 5 only]
No study questions.
VI. The Erie Doctrine
1. Swift v. Tyson & Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
I will talk you through this. We will not have time to read Erie itself.
2. Federal Courts’ Determination of State Law
Glannon 187-88 [do Examples 6-9]
Study Questions
3. Erie and “Procedure”
U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, cls. 9 & 18; U.S. Const. Art. III, § 1; 28 U.S.C. § 2072
F&K 345 [“Burden of Proof in Diversity Actions”]
F&K 363-67, 373-386 [do questions 10-11]
Study Questions
4. Federal Procedural Common Law After Hanna
F&K 389-92 [Walker]; 825-29 [Semtek]
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)
Study Questions
5. Horizontal (State-State) Choice of Law in Federal Court
F&K 345-47
Study Questions
6. Shady Grove
Shady Grove Orthopedic Assoc. v. Allstate
Study Questions